← Back to context

Comment by globular-toast

17 days ago

The test would be going through court. A company trying to hold an employee responsible for what a chatbot the company provided told them to do.

Who is taking anyone to court just to fire them? The test you’re describing seems implausible, I think you’ll have to look for other forms of evidence you find convincing, because you’ll be waiting indefinitely for this one.

  • Oh, I'm thinking more if an action caused damages outside of the company, like compromising a client's data or even breaking the law etc. Something that would get the courts involved. Say, for example, a vibe coded medical software made it to production and a patient received the wrong dose. Would it be the employee's fault for not using the tools correctly, or the company's fault for recommending the use of said tools?