← Back to context

Comment by TeMPOraL

2 hours ago

Ground breaking thought (ML Researchers Will Hate Me For): (some) hallucinations are actually creativity.

Creativity unbound by reference is not even dada (which was reactionary) it is noise

  • Because - it's the part people are having hard time to accept - creativity was never the hard part. It's randomness. The hard part is navigating the narrow border between "not enough random, therefore boring" and "too much random, therefore unhinged/insane".

    That border is determined not as much by ground truth, as by people's sentiment. As such, many famous artists and creatives never succeed navigating - their contemporaries would call them crazy, and then decades or centuries later, the border shifts, and suddenly they're remembered as greatest creators of their era.

    • That is not true at all. As I previously stated: reference, stealing well, blending styles in new ways that obey or break the rules of your art form… what appears random to outsiders is a story that follows as naturally as 2 after 1 if you understand the context.

      Until an AI can have desires or experience life it cannot tell a story.

      Even if it could it is questionable if such alien experience qualifies as story.

      It can retell stories. It can swirl around extant media like a child playing with its dinner. It cannot blend in its own lived and new perspectives which is what gives new art value.