← Back to context

Comment by anonymous908213

2 hours ago

I understand the fear that perception matters, and it does, which is why I take issue with articles like this and use terminology like 'psyop'. You are effectively harming your own cause when you write things like this:

> If anyone can point an LLM at slow code and it automatically finds a hot loop and uses a trick it found somewhere on the 'net to vectorize it, there is little point in hiring someone with a focus on that.

If you yourself are saying there is no point to hiring you because an LLM can do what you can do, when it actually can't, you are actively contributing to the perception you don't want to proliferate. And although I am financially set from my own work, I am also opposed to that perception proliferating because it is wrong, and the discourse around blatantly untrue things is extremely tiring. We need to bring perception closer to reality, not perpetuate the divergence of perception from reality. OpenAI and Anthropic have an extremely vested interest in influencing both industry and consumers to believe things about their products that are not true, because their dubious financial future is staked on people believing those things, but we don't need to help them along.

Yes, that's a good argument, thank you. You bring up a good point and I'll try to avoid making such claims in the future.