← Back to context Comment by dijit 12 hours ago In his defence, its a single command, if you know the command 3 comments dijit Reply terminalbraid 12 hours ago This, which is not uniform across servers, and has more work if you want to do certificate-based auth. Additionally getting a nick cloak is good opsec and also extremely not uniform. 0x457 5 hours ago Also funny watching peopel mistype the command in the wrong window and expose their "password for everything" to everyone in the chat. itintheory 10 hours ago The entire premise of cloaks as optional seems like broken UX to me. I'd like to see a new version make your connections details private by default.
terminalbraid 12 hours ago This, which is not uniform across servers, and has more work if you want to do certificate-based auth. Additionally getting a nick cloak is good opsec and also extremely not uniform. 0x457 5 hours ago Also funny watching peopel mistype the command in the wrong window and expose their "password for everything" to everyone in the chat. itintheory 10 hours ago The entire premise of cloaks as optional seems like broken UX to me. I'd like to see a new version make your connections details private by default.
0x457 5 hours ago Also funny watching peopel mistype the command in the wrong window and expose their "password for everything" to everyone in the chat.
itintheory 10 hours ago The entire premise of cloaks as optional seems like broken UX to me. I'd like to see a new version make your connections details private by default.
This, which is not uniform across servers, and has more work if you want to do certificate-based auth. Additionally getting a nick cloak is good opsec and also extremely not uniform.
Also funny watching peopel mistype the command in the wrong window and expose their "password for everything" to everyone in the chat.
The entire premise of cloaks as optional seems like broken UX to me. I'd like to see a new version make your connections details private by default.