Comment by blactuary

Some people feel like they have gained a great deal, some also disagree about the accuracy of claimed harms.

You seem uninterested in seeking a consensus and would rather prefer to impose rules that you believe in against the will of others, even when those others sincerely believe that their own path will lead to a better outcome for the world.

What would you propose that would be a mutually acceptable solution? Yo can't simply demand other people change their actions to deliver exactly what you want, especially when they think that would make the world significantly worse.

I am not taking a position on either side here. I am pointing out that you are refusing to acknowledge that you are demanding that people do things that they themselves believe will make the world worse.

You may disagree with them, that is expected if they disagree with you, but your certainty of being right does not permit you the right to override the will of others. Often, it seems that the less certain are more likely to have opinions that are correlated with reality.