Comment by sillyfluke

My view is that the human is needed for verifying the source of truth, not for providing precise language which the LLM is continuously trained to adapt better without.

I have not come across a rigorously argued technical analysis that has claimed that using precise language can in any way eliminate the possibility of hallucinations or unaligned behavior. Short of providing a proof for the elimination of hallucinations and confabulations, merely reducing the behavior by a random percentage is not an acceptable status quo for completely removing the human.