Comment by Matl
12 hours ago
> Does AI have the effect of tutors or textbooks, or something else?
With tutors or textbooks the explicit goal is to transfer their knowledge to you. With AI agents the goal is presumably to get things done and if you are happy with the results without wanting to understand how the thing you instructed the agent to do works, there's no knowledge transfer there.
I think the goal comes from the user. Some users want to solve a problem, some users may want to learn something. I'm not sure that having AI widely available really changes the ratio of the two, but I think I see AI availability as a factor that could accelerate the learning curve of the ones that have a goal of learning.
To contribute my n=1, I consider that when using LLMs I do have a huge pull towards "just let the AI cook", and often it really approaches problems better than I ever could. I try to keep the Rust's LLM policy in mind, let it review, search and suggest but not create, and hopefully that way I can keep my brain function. That was (until now?) one of the few things that couldn't be taken away from you easily.
I think that's fair. On the other hand whereas previously when you wanted to i.e. write software you HAD to learn something, now you don't. It could be that those who want to know will still want to know but it may also be that the knowledge becomes less desirable since it's not as valued any more.
At one point in computer history, you had to know how to create and submit a punchcard to run a program. In the age of AI, I think we're going to be sifting through what software knowledge is still relevant and what is punchcard operation for quite a while.