← Back to context Comment by Surac 11 days ago The question is. If rust used rust would that have prevented this? 5 comments Surac Reply zamalek 11 days ago Rust does not prevent all bugs, only certain ones (that are common and dangerous). romac 11 days ago The Rust compiler (rustc) is written in Rust, but there can always be bugs in the compiler, regardless of whether it's written in a memory-safe language or not. throawayonthe 10 days ago it's a joke, riffing on the "would rust have fixed this?" referring to any vulnerability loa_in_ 11 days ago Rust allows for type-proofing your logic, but it can't force you to. efficax 11 days ago no
zamalek 11 days ago Rust does not prevent all bugs, only certain ones (that are common and dangerous).
romac 11 days ago The Rust compiler (rustc) is written in Rust, but there can always be bugs in the compiler, regardless of whether it's written in a memory-safe language or not. throawayonthe 10 days ago it's a joke, riffing on the "would rust have fixed this?" referring to any vulnerability
throawayonthe 10 days ago it's a joke, riffing on the "would rust have fixed this?" referring to any vulnerability
Rust does not prevent all bugs, only certain ones (that are common and dangerous).
The Rust compiler (rustc) is written in Rust, but there can always be bugs in the compiler, regardless of whether it's written in a memory-safe language or not.
it's a joke, riffing on the "would rust have fixed this?" referring to any vulnerability
Rust allows for type-proofing your logic, but it can't force you to.
no