← Back to context

Comment by damsta

15 days ago

> The model launches today at an introductory price of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens (with cached input tokens at 95% off).

Couldn't you just say what the price will be after the introductory period and when it'll take effect? Do they have some SKILL.md for these blog posts that requires the most important information to always be buried ten levels deep and hidden behind a login page?

They're doubling the price on December 1st: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing#gemini-4-argon

$2/million input and $10/million output today. $4/$20 after December 1st.

  • With the pace they're delivering models, there's gonna be 1-2 new Gemini 4 versions by December 1st, presumably with their own introductory price windows. We just got Gemini 3.8 on 2 September and Gemini 3.7 on 13 August.

    • This reminds me of telephone commercials that ran back around 1987, saying they were offering long distance calls for 10 cents a minute (a pretty good price back then) and -- this was emphasized, a huge selling point -- they guaranteed your rate would never go up. In retrospect, all the lols :-)

    • I wonder if that’s more to price in the cost of keeping old models around on expensive inference hardware. It’s not like old models get cheaper to run, and a more heterogeneous fleet is less efficient to manage.

      1 reply →

    • Their last non-flash frontier release was 3.1 Pro back in February. Two new frontier releases at that pace would be Feb 2028.

  • Opus 5.5 is also priced at $4/$20, but are they on the same level?

    • At that price I think you'd pick Opus 5.5.

      It's perhaps a face saving thing to pretend you'll charge the same. Let's see if it actually happens.

> Couldn't you just say what the price will be after the introductory period

+1. FWIW, I didn't even get far enough to wonder about the price.

The lead (and only) sentence states "Our next era of frontier intelligence, built to solve your hardest problems" a statement equally true of any new Google or competitor model, hence completely devoid of useful meaning. I then kept scrolling down... and down... and down, giving up after a half dozen screens of big images, huge videos and some customer stories. The first sentence of every text block was equally vague or meaningless so... tv;dr (Too vague, didn't read).

Even the Gemini sub-reddit is laughing: https://www.reddit.com/r/GeminiAI/comments/1x2dr47/the_lates...

  • I mean its also been generated by a bunch of PM that want to get promoted but have little idea of what they're talking about..however nobody has been fired YET for using too much vague AI words.

It's irrelevant information, they know the reader switches models every week.

  • They don’t really. Most normies which are the vast majority of people just use ChatGPT. All tech folk just use Claude.

    • > They don’t really. Most normies which are the vast majority of people just use ChatGPT. All tech folk just use Claude.

      It was the case a year ago, but it's less clear cut nowadays, I've seen non-tech people using claude on their phone in the train, and many tech people seem to have switched from Claude Code + Opus to Codex + Sol over the past few month.

Me, watching the AI world from the sidelines while using DeepSeek at $0.15($0.003 cached)/$0.60 - still bitter about the pricing changes.

It might not be as smart, though my employer gives me access to Claude, so I tried giving the same task to Opus 5.5. Both DS4.1 Flash and Opus5.5 produced nearly identical outputs.

After that, my company switched the entire engineering department to Azure hosted DeepSeek4.1 and costs were cut by 3/4. So far, no one has really noticed the change.

  • I'm surprised no one's complaining about it randomly switching to mandarin. It seems like no matter what I do once every few days it'll go back to mandarin mid thinking trace and then stays in mandarin until I remind it to use English.