← Back to context Comment by locknitpicker 10 days ago [flagged] 2 comments locknitpicker Reply dang 10 days ago Please don't cross into personal attack. I realize the parent comment was a bit provocative, but that doesn't make it ok.We've had to ask you this before: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html smt88 10 days ago > I love the cope required to start ranting about C on a topic where a bug is found on a crítical selling point of rustRust was largely created to be safer than C, so comparing Rust to C is always relevant in a thread about Rust's safety.The comparison (that Rust is still an improvement over C, even if it has bugs) is relevant.
dang 10 days ago Please don't cross into personal attack. I realize the parent comment was a bit provocative, but that doesn't make it ok.We've had to ask you this before: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
smt88 10 days ago > I love the cope required to start ranting about C on a topic where a bug is found on a crítical selling point of rustRust was largely created to be safer than C, so comparing Rust to C is always relevant in a thread about Rust's safety.The comparison (that Rust is still an improvement over C, even if it has bugs) is relevant.
Please don't cross into personal attack. I realize the parent comment was a bit provocative, but that doesn't make it ok.
We've had to ask you this before: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
> I love the cope required to start ranting about C on a topic where a bug is found on a crítical selling point of rust
Rust was largely created to be safer than C, so comparing Rust to C is always relevant in a thread about Rust's safety.
The comparison (that Rust is still an improvement over C, even if it has bugs) is relevant.