← Back to context

Comment by miroljub

5 days ago

Why would Balkan tax payers pay to secure foreign corporation? Especially if that corporation is involved in a war they don't care which makes it a legitimate military target.

>Why would Balkan tax payers pay to secure foreign corporation?

Because foreign corporations operating in the Balkans pay taxes in the balkans, own property/real estate on Balkan soil on which their business operates, and employ workers in the balkans.

  • > Because foreign corporations operating in the Balkans pay taxes in the balkans

    Ahaha, as if.

    Foreign corporations with presence but no local entity pay no taxes. Foreign corporations with local entities somehow manage pay zero taxes because all profits are transferred to their Ireland parent entities.

    Domestic corporations have far less options to not pay taxes, so they mostly do.

  • Bulgaria is not a war party, Starlink is. Whatever taxes they pay, it doesn't cover special military protection or war involvement, just regular protection from theft, trespass and similar, like any other company not involved in war.

    • >Bulgaria is not a war party, Starlink is [...] it doesn't cover special military protection or war involvement

      Huh? So by your logic, if Russian soldiers in fatigues are shooting up a Ukrainian Roshen candy shop in Sofia Bulgaria, it's no the job of the Bulgarian state to intervene and fire back at those Russian soldiers on Bulgarian soil or arrest them, because according to you it's just a war dispute between Russia and Ukraine that doesn't concern Bulgaria and it's government law enforcement?

      In the end it'll be up to the courts to decide if the incident on Starlink is an act of war not covered by insurance and law enforcement, or vandalism that falls under the responsibility of the Bulgarian state law enforcement, but you're logic is pure comedic FUBAR.

      3 replies →

Because that foreign corporation presumedly purchased the local property, pays local taxes on it, and probably employs some local people. Or are you claiming that the property of anyone foreign anywhere is up for grabs because they're foreign?

  • In many countries, foreigners are not even allowed to buy property in the first place.

    It’s not exactly uncommon or inconceivable that yes, the property of foreigners doesn’t quite get the same protections.

You're seriously asking why the state would enforce property rights?

  • They should rather seize the property of a company trying to make a country involved in war and endangering its population by operating military actions from that country soil.

    • You're stretching it beyond sound reason.

      And by your own argument, Bulgaria would also be at war with Russia then, since Bulgaria has been supporting Ukraine with weapons and material in this war.

      1 reply →