Comment by oliculipolicula

[sorry. Let's do this "Socratic" dialogue well]

Institutional reforms seem to go through better if done proactively. Eg, Sweden, 1990s, preempted China shock. What gave? Had the right people been voted in (at various levels)? Was there a culture of running parallel optimisations (org-Darwinist take) of status quo ante?

You might be able to apply those to how Swiss institutional-reforms (if any) preempted China shock

(or, now, how they are handling vs just avoidinh "migrant shock", orthogonally to the "resilient" demographic, popular framings, etc)