← Back to context

Comment by camkego

4 days ago

Whether you find them beautiful or ugly, I think it’s kind of sad you probably couldn’t build these today as dwellings due to building codes. (Or maybe you could?)

I was thinking, we now know more about effects of various chemicals on the body. And probably fire regulation has been updated too. A lot of this material was quite new then and of course there was a lot of experimentation, and some things that ended up as "dead ends". What would a modern Futuro look like?

In the birth country of Futuro, the craze has been the opposite for at least a decade: all natural and old fashioned materials. Log houses, maybe even stone foundation, natural circulation, clay/chalk wall finishing, tar paper, shredded newspaper + flax insulation. No glue or plastics anywhere. Some of this is first hand experience.

I think one could build a modern and retro futuro-like thing with enough cleverness. Maybe from some wicker style material? The rain proofing is a problem.

  • I wonder about that… things like creosote were used in older times but not all that great for health either …

Don't people build all kinds of tiny houses and live in them? How does that work with building codes?

I think you might have to get creative with your local building code for garden sheds / modular homes / trailers etc. Or find some way to designate it as a caravan.

Building codes? What building codes? Where we’re going we don’t need no stinkin’ building codes .. because we seceded from the host nation and have created our own micro-state/principality/sovereignty deal, and if we wanna live in a bubble, then blow away, Oida!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelmugel