Comment by aw1621107

> That "test bed" description fits Rust way better.

This assertion seems rather debatable given Rust's general lack of trailblazing in the language design space.

> Rust is in many ways also significantly more complex than C++, believe it or not.

I'm a bit skeptical that "many" is the right qualifier there. "Some", perhaps, but it isn't obvious to me how you'd reach "many".