← Back to context Comment by rerdavies 3 days ago Now you know. It's VERY bad practice. 2 comments rerdavies Reply fc417fc802 3 days ago I don't see how. It's certainly not encouraged but then I'm doing it to work around the bad practice of others so what do you expect? rerdavies 2 days ago Why do you not simply define your OWN version of assert with a different name?It's very bad practice because you have altered the behavior of the standard library.
fc417fc802 3 days ago I don't see how. It's certainly not encouraged but then I'm doing it to work around the bad practice of others so what do you expect? rerdavies 2 days ago Why do you not simply define your OWN version of assert with a different name?It's very bad practice because you have altered the behavior of the standard library.
rerdavies 2 days ago Why do you not simply define your OWN version of assert with a different name?It's very bad practice because you have altered the behavior of the standard library.
I don't see how. It's certainly not encouraged but then I'm doing it to work around the bad practice of others so what do you expect?
Why do you not simply define your OWN version of assert with a different name?
It's very bad practice because you have altered the behavior of the standard library.