← Back to context

Comment by bluefirebrand

3 days ago

> When jobs get automated, almost always, people find other jobs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy

Yes yes I'm aware of the fallacy

It's obviously not the whole picture though. When Number of Jobs automated approaches 100% then what?

If the number of jobs automated approaches 100%, then either what small proportion that is left is still sufficient to pay people, whether because the number of jobs in absolute terms is still large, say by the creation of new types of work, or because of reduction in working hours, or mass unemployment eventually forces some form of redistribution.

Large scale automation is only a problem if society allows it to become a problem.

  • Unfortunately the gains of automation will not become our post scarcity utopia, instead they will be consumed by the new AI overhead and we remain in a regime of scarcity. AI will reshape all our processes and societies, that is where the gains will go.

  • > Large scale automation is only a problem if society allows it to become a problem.

    When I look around me I see a society that I think would happily have jackboots round up excess labor and execute us rather than redistribute money fairly

    So I wish I had your optimism

    • Well, I didn't say I'm confident that society won't allow it to become a problem. But I don't think a society that triggers mass unemployment and poverty at the same time will remain like that for long before it'd face uprisings. A society like that would also face the problem that without people having money they have no customers.

    • If you redistribute money evenly, how would you get anyone to do anything?

      If you gave everyone $10k a month UBI, who is going to change your tire? How much you have to pay them to go to work if they get $10k while sitting at home?

      If a town has a lack of apartments, how much will an apartment cost if a young couple has $20k a month to spend?

      5 replies →

> When Number of Jobs automated approaches 100% then what?

When was that? Or hypothetical? Why would that be and not that new jobs being created?