← Back to context

Comment by collinmcnulty

3 days ago

Junk ratings are not investment grade. They’re rating this debt as at least a little bit sketchy.

From the article:

"The rating action, which has not previously been reported, shows Anthropic is close to achieving the investment-grade status that would allow the start-up to lower its borrowing costs and tap a wider pool of institutional investors including life insurance companies and pension funds.

Bankers for Anthropic and rival OpenAI have lobbied the largest rating agencies to grant the AI labs investment-grade ratings once they go public."

  • The fact that the only rating published is ‘junk’, and that it was from a small agency tells us quite a lot. Given the fact that Anthropic (or its representatives) likely ‘shopped’ for a rating means that this was the best anyone was willing to give them, and that the larger agencies probably refused to rate them without more information. I would have been surprised if the bankers hadn’t lobbied for the highest rating possible, as higher ratings increase their profits from the IPO.

    • The whole point is to slowly build credibility, starting with easily $wayed small ratings entities, then launder that credibility into a slightly larger one, rise and repeat until financial disaster.