← Back to context Comment by fckgw 2 days ago Would you say a bullfrog that can hop from pad to pad can fly? 10 comments fckgw Reply cwillu 2 days ago A frog can't hover for any amount of time. jacquesm 2 days ago Neither can this car. Unless 'any amount of time' is sub second, then fine, it can hover. But then a brick on a ballistic trajectory also hovers when it is at the top of that trajectory. y1n0 1 day ago The amount of time a ballistic object hovers with a speed of 0 is also 0. It literally never hovers. Look it up. 5 replies → cwillu 1 day ago No, a ballistic trajectory is at no point “hovering”. That was literally my point regarding the frog. y1n0 1 day ago Are you all so dense as to not grasp the difference between controlled flight vs ballistic?
cwillu 2 days ago A frog can't hover for any amount of time. jacquesm 2 days ago Neither can this car. Unless 'any amount of time' is sub second, then fine, it can hover. But then a brick on a ballistic trajectory also hovers when it is at the top of that trajectory. y1n0 1 day ago The amount of time a ballistic object hovers with a speed of 0 is also 0. It literally never hovers. Look it up. 5 replies → cwillu 1 day ago No, a ballistic trajectory is at no point “hovering”. That was literally my point regarding the frog.
jacquesm 2 days ago Neither can this car. Unless 'any amount of time' is sub second, then fine, it can hover. But then a brick on a ballistic trajectory also hovers when it is at the top of that trajectory. y1n0 1 day ago The amount of time a ballistic object hovers with a speed of 0 is also 0. It literally never hovers. Look it up. 5 replies → cwillu 1 day ago No, a ballistic trajectory is at no point “hovering”. That was literally my point regarding the frog.
y1n0 1 day ago The amount of time a ballistic object hovers with a speed of 0 is also 0. It literally never hovers. Look it up. 5 replies →
cwillu 1 day ago No, a ballistic trajectory is at no point “hovering”. That was literally my point regarding the frog.
y1n0 1 day ago Are you all so dense as to not grasp the difference between controlled flight vs ballistic?
A frog can't hover for any amount of time.
Neither can this car. Unless 'any amount of time' is sub second, then fine, it can hover. But then a brick on a ballistic trajectory also hovers when it is at the top of that trajectory.
The amount of time a ballistic object hovers with a speed of 0 is also 0. It literally never hovers. Look it up.
5 replies →
No, a ballistic trajectory is at no point “hovering”. That was literally my point regarding the frog.
Are you all so dense as to not grasp the difference between controlled flight vs ballistic?