← Back to context

Comment by handoflixue

3 days ago

If you want to claim something is harmful, you have to actually demonstrate that harm. Otherwise your claim is merely that it could be harmful, which is by default true of basically everything, and thus not a very interesting point.

"Leaks information" is perfectly compatible with "provably anonymous"

You have to prove that the leak is enough to actually de-anonymize someone to disprove anonymity.

I'm not saying it can't be done, but you're jumping ahead and skipping a very important step.