← Back to context Comment by yorwba 5 hours ago How did you determine that it has been "flagged by many"? 10 comments yorwba Reply Barbing 1 hour ago Interesting, #1 raw rank yet never made it past ~#10 - haven’t seen that specifically: https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=50133401 pranshuchittora 1 hour ago Thanks for the detailed metrics. This proves my point... xendo 3 hours ago It's clearly heavily down voted, just look at when it was added, how many points it has and its relative position. throwoutway 2 hours ago You cant downvote HN posts (comments you can) an0malous 2 hours ago They presumably meant that it’s been downranked relative to what you’d expect from a post with that many upvotes in that short of a time frame. Hundreds of upvotes in a few hours is usually a top 5 post _fw 2 hours ago Afaik flagging acts like a super-downvote as far as the algorithm is concerned 1 reply → pranshuchittora 4 hours ago The post was visible when I am logged in. But when I opened the /newest page on incognito the post wasn't there. senordevnyc 4 hours ago It’s #14 on homepage when not logged in, same as when logged in. pranshuchittora 4 hours ago Now it is
Barbing 1 hour ago Interesting, #1 raw rank yet never made it past ~#10 - haven’t seen that specifically: https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=50133401 pranshuchittora 1 hour ago Thanks for the detailed metrics. This proves my point...
xendo 3 hours ago It's clearly heavily down voted, just look at when it was added, how many points it has and its relative position. throwoutway 2 hours ago You cant downvote HN posts (comments you can) an0malous 2 hours ago They presumably meant that it’s been downranked relative to what you’d expect from a post with that many upvotes in that short of a time frame. Hundreds of upvotes in a few hours is usually a top 5 post _fw 2 hours ago Afaik flagging acts like a super-downvote as far as the algorithm is concerned 1 reply →
throwoutway 2 hours ago You cant downvote HN posts (comments you can) an0malous 2 hours ago They presumably meant that it’s been downranked relative to what you’d expect from a post with that many upvotes in that short of a time frame. Hundreds of upvotes in a few hours is usually a top 5 post _fw 2 hours ago Afaik flagging acts like a super-downvote as far as the algorithm is concerned 1 reply →
an0malous 2 hours ago They presumably meant that it’s been downranked relative to what you’d expect from a post with that many upvotes in that short of a time frame. Hundreds of upvotes in a few hours is usually a top 5 post
_fw 2 hours ago Afaik flagging acts like a super-downvote as far as the algorithm is concerned 1 reply →
pranshuchittora 4 hours ago The post was visible when I am logged in. But when I opened the /newest page on incognito the post wasn't there. senordevnyc 4 hours ago It’s #14 on homepage when not logged in, same as when logged in. pranshuchittora 4 hours ago Now it is
senordevnyc 4 hours ago It’s #14 on homepage when not logged in, same as when logged in. pranshuchittora 4 hours ago Now it is
Interesting, #1 raw rank yet never made it past ~#10 - haven’t seen that specifically: https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=50133401
Thanks for the detailed metrics. This proves my point...
It's clearly heavily down voted, just look at when it was added, how many points it has and its relative position.
You cant downvote HN posts (comments you can)
They presumably meant that it’s been downranked relative to what you’d expect from a post with that many upvotes in that short of a time frame. Hundreds of upvotes in a few hours is usually a top 5 post
Afaik flagging acts like a super-downvote as far as the algorithm is concerned
1 reply →
The post was visible when I am logged in. But when I opened the /newest page on incognito the post wasn't there.
It’s #14 on homepage when not logged in, same as when logged in.
Now it is