← Back to context Comment by Armecera 7 hours ago Yeah, I already see a few mistakes just looking at this page. But I guess still useful? 1 comment Armecera Reply cloudbonsai 3 hours ago Yeah. I experimented with a random Japanese news article. Scanning it with my eyeballs, I found: Correct .. 80 chars Missing .. 12 chars Wrong .... 8 chars So I guess the accuracy is roughly 80%. Maybe useful, but not super reliable.
cloudbonsai 3 hours ago Yeah. I experimented with a random Japanese news article. Scanning it with my eyeballs, I found: Correct .. 80 chars Missing .. 12 chars Wrong .... 8 chars So I guess the accuracy is roughly 80%. Maybe useful, but not super reliable.
Yeah. I experimented with a random Japanese news article. Scanning it with my eyeballs, I found:
So I guess the accuracy is roughly 80%. Maybe useful, but not super reliable.