← Back to context Comment by jxramos 4 hours ago I'm curious, what exactly in the DOM is not XML-compatible? 4 comments jxramos Reply degamad 3 hours ago From long-lost memory, I think it's implicitly closed tags (e.g. img). jdiff 3 hours ago XML can handle implicitly closed tags, they call them "empty" in the spec here:https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-starttags plorkyeran 2 hours ago Empty tags in XML are not implicitly closed. They require the explicit /. conartist6 2 hours ago XML can handle <img /> but not <img> followed by tagsoup (like HTML handles).
degamad 3 hours ago From long-lost memory, I think it's implicitly closed tags (e.g. img). jdiff 3 hours ago XML can handle implicitly closed tags, they call them "empty" in the spec here:https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-starttags plorkyeran 2 hours ago Empty tags in XML are not implicitly closed. They require the explicit /. conartist6 2 hours ago XML can handle <img /> but not <img> followed by tagsoup (like HTML handles).
jdiff 3 hours ago XML can handle implicitly closed tags, they call them "empty" in the spec here:https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-starttags plorkyeran 2 hours ago Empty tags in XML are not implicitly closed. They require the explicit /. conartist6 2 hours ago XML can handle <img /> but not <img> followed by tagsoup (like HTML handles).
From long-lost memory, I think it's implicitly closed tags (e.g. img).
XML can handle implicitly closed tags, they call them "empty" in the spec here:
https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-starttags
Empty tags in XML are not implicitly closed. They require the explicit /.
XML can handle <img /> but not <img> followed by tagsoup (like HTML handles).