Yes, I recognise that you cannot see beyond your personal enjoyment. Maybe one day you'll gain some self awareness of how your brain is seeking and self-rewarding with dopamine.
It would seem we've filled the queue on the other thread. Allow me to respond to you here:
> is an assertion without supporting evidence
I’m sorry, I thought the evidence was obvious. Allow me to explain it to you: someone who has a history of lying has a significantly higher chance of lying again than someone who does not.
> You also construct your own straw man
Asking a question is not putting words in someone’s mouth - and it was resolved with his simple “No”.
> The insults
Oh my. Do you really want to go there after this sequence:
> you're moving from the territory of reasonable questions to
moderately desperate conspiracy theory
> Your confusion is understandable given your own (excruciatingly
obvious) motives.
> find the words to make yourself feel good when pressing 'reply'
> I humbly apologise. When I said you were confused, I only meant
to state a fact, not cause you harm.
> These linguistic motte-and-bailey tricks are pure debate bro.
Motte-and-bailey? I have not retracted a single thing.
> hope of actually changing the other person's mind
HA! I realized that would be impossible quite a long time ago. Now it’s just a fun game to see how bloodied you get.
> I humbly apologise.
OH! No need. I enjoyed explaining it to you.
Yes, I recognise that you cannot see beyond your personal enjoyment. Maybe one day you'll gain some self awareness of how your brain is seeking and self-rewarding with dopamine.
LOL! Playing the sad card after spending the day slinging personal insults? I'm not that dumb, friend. Try again.
It would seem we've filled the queue on the other thread. Allow me to respond to you here:
> is an assertion without supporting evidence
I’m sorry, I thought the evidence was obvious. Allow me to explain it to you: someone who has a history of lying has a significantly higher chance of lying again than someone who does not.
> You also construct your own straw man
Asking a question is not putting words in someone’s mouth - and it was resolved with his simple “No”.
> The insults
Oh my. Do you really want to go there after this sequence:
> you're moving from the territory of reasonable questions to moderately desperate conspiracy theory
> Your confusion is understandable given your own (excruciatingly obvious) motives.
> find the words to make yourself feel good when pressing 'reply'
> I humbly apologise. When I said you were confused, I only meant to state a fact, not cause you harm.
> These linguistic motte-and-bailey tricks are pure debate bro.
Motte-and-bailey? I have not retracted a single thing.
> hope of actually changing the other person's mind
HA! I realized that would be impossible quite a long time ago. Now it’s just a fun game to see how bloodied you get.
> Now it’s just a fun game to see how bloodied you get.
As I said, pure debate bro.
Sticks and stones, my dude. Sticks and stones.