Comment by willy_k
2 hours ago
As an ex-prefacer, imo it’s a hedge against the nudging recognition that the thought being hedged is based on a pyramid of iffy connections (usually more word-of-mouth type “science”), rather than an articulable, concrete a->b->c.
ngl, I did not understand what you said
Edited, is that clearer?
I think so though not sure I get your point with that
Do you mean to say that pseudoscience topics are perceived negatively?