Comment by qarl
7 hours ago
> Ok then whatever claims you’ve made against Elon I can deny since it’s just Copperfield unless I’ve seen it myself lol.
You misunderstand - I’m claiming the opposite - your eyes are not sufficient proof. Just because you saw a flying car does not mean there was a flying car. See also: David Copperfield.
And I can cite references for all my claims about Elon. Do you need to see them?
> No. Get a grip.
Your sentence doesn’t parse, full stop. If it does, please show how. Every time you dodge the question of the main verb, you provide more evidence against yourself.
> And I can cite references for all my claims about Elon. Do you need to see them?
> your eyes are not sufficient proof
Sorry your references are not sufficient proof
> Your sentence doesn’t parse, full stop. If it does, please show how. Every time you dodge the question of the main verb, you provide more evidence against yourself.
I don’t need to show how. I just say you’re wrong and then that is the truth. You can’t argue against it.
Check mate