← Back to context Comment by redox99 21 hours ago It's really not neck and neck with Opus 5.5. 6 comments redox99 Reply lejalv 20 hours ago Cost-adjusted,it might be ahead.It's key to name the boundary conditions. Unlimited cost is a very HN assumption. TomGarden 20 hours ago Max Subscription seems to be the HN assumption most of the time eru 20 hours ago Really depends on your use case.You are right that there's plenty of use cases where Opus 5.5 is better. gvfsa 20 hours ago If it depends on your use case then it’s not neck and neck… eru 15 hours ago Why? I'm pretty sure I can find use cases for which DeepSeek is better. Rodmine 17 hours ago True, it isn't neck-and-neck. It's neck and balls. Deepseek's balls and Opus 5.5's neck. Whatever you can build with Opus 5.5, I can build in the same time, 1/500th the price with Deepseek Flash 4.1.
lejalv 20 hours ago Cost-adjusted,it might be ahead.It's key to name the boundary conditions. Unlimited cost is a very HN assumption. TomGarden 20 hours ago Max Subscription seems to be the HN assumption most of the time
eru 20 hours ago Really depends on your use case.You are right that there's plenty of use cases where Opus 5.5 is better. gvfsa 20 hours ago If it depends on your use case then it’s not neck and neck… eru 15 hours ago Why? I'm pretty sure I can find use cases for which DeepSeek is better.
gvfsa 20 hours ago If it depends on your use case then it’s not neck and neck… eru 15 hours ago Why? I'm pretty sure I can find use cases for which DeepSeek is better.
Rodmine 17 hours ago True, it isn't neck-and-neck. It's neck and balls. Deepseek's balls and Opus 5.5's neck. Whatever you can build with Opus 5.5, I can build in the same time, 1/500th the price with Deepseek Flash 4.1.
Cost-adjusted,it might be ahead.
It's key to name the boundary conditions. Unlimited cost is a very HN assumption.
Max Subscription seems to be the HN assumption most of the time
Really depends on your use case.
You are right that there's plenty of use cases where Opus 5.5 is better.
If it depends on your use case then it’s not neck and neck…
Why? I'm pretty sure I can find use cases for which DeepSeek is better.
True, it isn't neck-and-neck. It's neck and balls. Deepseek's balls and Opus 5.5's neck. Whatever you can build with Opus 5.5, I can build in the same time, 1/500th the price with Deepseek Flash 4.1.