← Back to context

Comment by ethbr1

10 days ago

In the before times, we used government regulation to enforce private company responsibility in accordance with authority.

If Meta and X want to be a public square, then one of the costs should be hiring enough human moderators to rapidly review critical cases (political, health, hate/conspiracy, etc).

If they don't... fine, then make money doing something else.

But at their current scale, this is really a resource allocation question about whether their margin is a few points higher or lower.

Absolving themselves of democratic responsibilities in exchange for a few bucks is gross.

I don't know why you're telling ME this, I'm just the messenger. But also it's quite confused:

> If Meta and X want to be a public square, then one of the costs should be hiring enough human moderators to rapidly review critical cases (political, health, hate/conspiracy, etc).

They did that. Then they decided to no longer do so -- "should" is a noise word. It's your opinion and clearly they don't care.

> If they don't... fine, then make money doing something else.

Who are you even addressing? "Hey Meta, make money doing something else!" -- only in some bizarre narcissistic fantasy world does say such things have any effect.

> Absolving themselves of democratic responsibilities in exchange for a few bucks is gross.

Um, yes. Now grow up.