I think leadership should be responsible too, but I don't know how you'd prevent disgruntled employees from creating these situations just to hurt execs. There needs to be some shared responsibility for all the people involved.
It should be investigated like other crimes. If someone was found to have intentionally created this situation, they would be held liable. In lieu of that, leadership should be held liable, or at a minimum the corporation should face massive financial penalties (on the order of XX% operating revenue).
> I think leadership should be responsible too, but I don't know how you'd prevent disgruntled employees from creating these situations just to hurt execs.
The law doesn't prevent anything. There would be an investigation like any other and the activity of the disgruntled employee would be uncovered.
I think leadership should be responsible too, but I don't know how you'd prevent disgruntled employees from creating these situations just to hurt execs. There needs to be some shared responsibility for all the people involved.
It should be investigated like other crimes. If someone was found to have intentionally created this situation, they would be held liable. In lieu of that, leadership should be held liable, or at a minimum the corporation should face massive financial penalties (on the order of XX% operating revenue).
> I think leadership should be responsible too, but I don't know how you'd prevent disgruntled employees from creating these situations just to hurt execs.
The law doesn't prevent anything. There would be an investigation like any other and the activity of the disgruntled employee would be uncovered.