← Back to context

Comment by pixl97

10 hours ago

>can they not predict harmful consequences

Do you really really want the machines to be capable of that?

How deep should this consequence prediction go? Who's consequences should it care about the most? The company that created it? The country it operates in? A generic human idealism that contains what exactly?

Should the AI answer with the way things are, our how things 'ought' to be?

There is a staggering amount of philosophy behind that simple question.

My opinion is irrelevant, what matters is whether or not it is profitable for a machine to be able to predict the future. It is extremely profitable, therefore if such a machine can be built, it will.

Anyway for the purposes of alignment, you do need the ability to think through consequences. Although in this case maybe a simple "fraud = bad" would have sufficed.