← Back to context

Comment by potsandpans

2 hours ago

> So I think it's less about linguistics and more about our audiovisual mapping of the physical world.

There's probably an overlap that makes the distinction fuzzy.

There’s an overlap, but the observation from the parent comment turns this widely cited phenomenon from a supposed mystery or deep insight into something trivial.

It’s like observing that humans across cultures agree that the word “woof” refers to a dog and the word “miaw” refers to a cat… no shit.