← Back to context

Comment by jacquesm

18 hours ago

I'm getting plenty of mileage without that and anything with a motor in it requires that you do your utmost best to ensure it works within the design envelope.

We aren't going to get useful humanoid robots while understanding the implementation fully.

If you can't leverage AI to build a safe and useful robot without fully understanding the implementation, the model is not good enough.

  • There are so many assumptions in these two lines that I don't know where to begin. I wish you best of luck.

    • The humanoid robot was an example.

      My argument is that if safety and liability make the use of AI without fully understanding the implementation impossible, the model is arguably not good enough.

      5 replies →