← Back to context

Comment by zahlman

6 hours ago

By pinning the blame on the wrong ideology (with full confidence, apparently based on nothing but his own world view, and implying that others were dishonest in coming to a different (ultimately shown to be correct, and strongly evidenced at the time) conclusion, he ran cover for the ideological group responsible, and their narrative.

Are you suggesting that it's not OK to take a side in a debate, or that by doing so, you are sympathizing with a murderer?

You're going to need a jet pack to traverse the logical leaps you're making here.