Comment by Eisenstein

> Somehow, suburbs both have the best amenities and the lowest taxes but they are unsustainable?

The best amenities? What does that mean, specifically?

> In reality, since suburbs have low crime, the policing is cheap.

Are you sure?

"The average spending on police for jurisdictions with more than one million people was 10 percent in 2017. The average for jurisdictions with fewer than 50,000 people was 13 percent."

- https://www.urban.org/policy-centers/cross-center-initiative...

> But somehow the large city next door, with billions in debt and all the jobs (and thus the payroll taxes) has terrible services and terrible schools.

Not sure what that has to do with the sustainability of suburbs.

> I think you just don't like suburbs and will twist your logic into knots to claim a rational reason for it. Truth is, you just don't like suburbs. Most people do, get over it.

That has nothing to do with whether what they are arguing is correct or not.