← Back to context

Comment by throwaway81523

6 hours ago

> Our American obsession with jail is nuts.

If we were really obsessed with jail for executives, a lot more of them would be locked up right now. There might be an obsession, but it's only about jailing peons.

> If we were really obsessed with jail for executives, a lot more of them would be locked up right now

This is the opposite of what happens in any incarceration-happy culture. See: the French Revolution. The rich got away, got richer, in fact. The machines of terror inevitable turned on the poor. Liberties are most valuable to those of us who are not billionaires.

  • Sure, but we can still all be pissed about the upper class being beyond consequences that us plebs get.

    If I do something to fuck over this many people and harm society this much I’m going to jail. No billionaire is having the same consequences.

    Until that changes you are going to have people be willing to back table flipping movements like the French Revolution in a gamble to maybe give consequences to those in charge. Hell that’s more than half the reason we got Trump.

    Also I’m going to call out your analysis of the French Revolution as failing entirely as poor. Some of the rich got richer but people wanted the kings head and they definitely got it.

    • > we can still all be pissed about the upper class being beyond consequences that us plebs get

      Sure. Light a bonfire. Scream and windmills. And then come to your senses and realises lowering the bar for criminality will absolutely not limits its blast radius to the people you want it to.

      > you are going to have people be willing to back table flipping movements like the French Revolution

      The rich got richer in the French Revolution! America’s rich want that.

      4 replies →

Our system consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.