← Back to context Comment by n1b0m 16 hours ago Serious question, do you? 4 comments n1b0m Reply butlike 14 hours ago Yes. The goal is not to get the rapist off, the goal is to make sure the process is working correctly and the plaintiff has done their due diligence. cindyllm 12 hours ago [dead] mcmcmc 13 hours ago No. Tons of lawyers never even touch criminal law. You do not need to be a defense attorney to be a lawyer. ninalanyon 14 hours ago Someone has to or there can not be a conviction. Clearly guilty is something that can only truly be said after the decision.Unless you want to completely overturn the way criminal trials are conducted in the Anglo American judicial tradition.
butlike 14 hours ago Yes. The goal is not to get the rapist off, the goal is to make sure the process is working correctly and the plaintiff has done their due diligence. cindyllm 12 hours ago [dead]
mcmcmc 13 hours ago No. Tons of lawyers never even touch criminal law. You do not need to be a defense attorney to be a lawyer.
ninalanyon 14 hours ago Someone has to or there can not be a conviction. Clearly guilty is something that can only truly be said after the decision.Unless you want to completely overturn the way criminal trials are conducted in the Anglo American judicial tradition.
Yes. The goal is not to get the rapist off, the goal is to make sure the process is working correctly and the plaintiff has done their due diligence.
[dead]
No. Tons of lawyers never even touch criminal law. You do not need to be a defense attorney to be a lawyer.
Someone has to or there can not be a conviction. Clearly guilty is something that can only truly be said after the decision.
Unless you want to completely overturn the way criminal trials are conducted in the Anglo American judicial tradition.