← Back to context

Comment by g_a_a_s

19 hours ago

> However, the level of social media amplification around this incident has brought scrutiny that is out of proportion to SSL/TLS’s place in our business.

What a weak minded statement. Just admit you messed up and call it a day.

Immediately and totally exiting the domain is about as close to admit you messed up and call it a day as you'll ever get from a modern company.

The statement can use whatever weasel words it likes, but the action pretty clearly says "we aren't mature enough as an organisation to handle this responsibility." Which would be quite the concern for me, if I were a customer for one of eMudhra's other product lines.

I do agree it is out of proportion, they deserve a lot more amplification

  • As someone who's well-versed with the "face-saving" aspects of Indian culture, I can state with clarity that the statement they put out is completely in character.

    Folks in India — especially the boomer class — are trepidated by how they're perceived over actual substance and quality of their work (exceptions exist, of course).

    Edit: Sudhir Kakar's (an Indian psychoanalyst) work on Indian identity (The Inner World, Intimate Relations) helped me decode my own origin culture's internal logic. Highly recommend it for people of South Asian diaspora.

    • I am curious, not that I agree it exists or understand the reality of izzat, how does it differ in saving face provided by gentlemen who allow the loser to have a graceful defeat?

      In martial arts the winner will often say "I got lucky" or "you almost had me" to allow the loser to save face, at least publicly, when in reality the skill gap is evident.

      2 replies →

    • This!

      Also, this is the response from official Indian Ministry of Electronics & IT:

      …” However, some social media accounts are indulging in fear mongering about the impact of this incident.…”

      Bruh, you just literally 4 as private key

      Lol

      Edit: removed a section as rightly pointed out in comment below!

      4 replies →

    • > As someone who's well-versed with the "face-saving" aspects of Indian work culture, I can state with clarity that the statement they put out is completely in character.

      As someone who's blood is tainted with teflon and microplastics same as you, I can state with clarity that attributing universal corporate tendencies to national work culture is completely in character for a Sagittarius.

    • > Folks in India — especially the boomer class — are trepidated by how they're perceived over actual substance and quality of their work

      Just the sheer size and diversity of the Indian "boomer class" could put such generalizations in doubt?

      > As someone who's well-versed with the "face-saving" aspects of Indian work culture, I can state with clarity

      Pause to consider that the world might appear to you as you imagine it to be. That is, it might be holding up a mirror in to your own psyche.

DigiCert threatened legal action against companies that asked them embarrassing questions after they had to revoke certificates due to a bug.[1]

It raises the question why these CAs agree to participate on this forum and then complain about doing so.

1: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950144

  • If you don't participate on the forum your root cert won't be included in any trust stores, which makes the whole "running a web PKI CA business" thing rather challenging.

> admit you messed up

You apparently don't understand Indians.

  • I hate to say this but majority of my professional encounters with Indians were with people having this little sense of accountability. But then again, with many awesome exceptions! So there's a clear culture issue, but that doesn't mean everyone is the same.

Culturally, that reply makes perfect sense.

e.g. Japanese culture in many circumstances requires a company to rush to apologize for the smallest perceived (not even actual) fault

  • Yeah I remember that incident when Toyota Prius had a recall due to brake failure caused by an ABS software issue in rare circumstances and Toyoda himself apologized publicly.

  • > e.g. Japanese culture in many circumstances requires a company to rush to apologize for the smallest perceived (not even actual) fault

    For a something this big they'd probably have execs making a visit to a certain forest.

  • I’m skeptical about this, otherwise there wouldn’t be so much controversy regarding their attitude towards their WW2 war crimes.

    • There is a big difference between a member of a culture apologizing to other members of that culture, and an entire culture apologizing to the world.

      2 replies →

    • This one is basically Japan being social media IRL since before it. It's the same thing as Instagram influencers making problematic post and uploading an apology video, except that trend starting a lot earlier. Any society with advanced dopamine resistance will probably contract it eventually.

      War crimes stuffs is a separate and a bit more nuanced issue. It's also not just the simple matter of admitting or denying it.

    • Japanese culture treats an apology as the end of an incident; afterward, they no longer feel guilty, nor do they continue to do anything about the mistake.

The key was enough of a statement of TLS's place in their business. No new information here.

To admit having messed up they would need to include the full private key in the post, which they seem to have decided is still more embarrassing than not including it.

What I hear is that he is saying that the SSL/TLS business is only a small part of their overall business and that they can close that part down as a result of the loss of reputation for that this has rendered.

While I admit their explanation is questionable, they did admit they messed up.

I see this more as "we didn't know this was so complex and the juice no longer looks worth the squeeze."

The gall to write that after using the integer 4 as a private key.

  • It's not quite as egregious as someone purposely choosing the key. According to the write up on the Mozilla bugtracker there was a bug in the script used for there key generation ceremony which caused the bad certificates to be generated. Obviously completely unacceptable for a CA, but makes more sense than someone plucking 4 out of the air while generating a root cert.

Jesus H Christ these guys had literally the number 4 as their secret and they call telling them they're incompetent an "out of proportion" reaction?

  • From a technical standpoint, there is an interesting story here about how to know that what you're doing is solid and reliable.

    I have to assume the fact this didn't get discovered suggests they weren't investing in trying to break their own crypto. A good takeaway for anyone else who wants to be in this space.

Plus „scrutiny“ - a company is a trust line of business shouldn’t be afraid of scrutiny

Probably just a botched translation though

  • > Probably just a botched translation though

    Indians at this level operate with English as their native language.

"We've been caught out showing that we didn't know what we were doing. And we think people sharing that is disproportionate"

Clearly you never had a manager from India, otherwise you’d know this is standard protocol.