Comment by xp84
15 hours ago
It was right there in the clause before the one you quoted. They reduced it by 90%. That 90% was arbitrary and based on vibes.
In math terms, Concrete × vibes = vibes. Feel free to prove me wrong.
15 hours ago
It was right there in the clause before the one you quoted. They reduced it by 90%. That 90% was arbitrary and based on vibes.
In math terms, Concrete × vibes = vibes. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Nonsense. You're stating that you have insight into the motivations of a judge without any evidence that you have any inkling, at all, that you know why a decision was reached. You made a claim, feel free to provide any evidence to back up that claim.
The best part is the clause you tell me to reference is extensively explained in the judgement. That you haven't read.