← Back to context

Comment by Zak

17 hours ago

I'm for being able to hack your own device to do whatever you like with it, preferably without active resistance from its manufacturer. I'm against anybody who can convince you to open a PDF being able to hack your device to do whatever they like with it.

The point the parent commenter is making is that they want Apple to allow people the freedom to intentionally mod the functionality of their device. Not that they literally want single-click PDF exploits to be a thing.

Who is saying this?

  • The link here demonstrates an exploit which runs arbitrary code on an iPhone when the user opens a PDF.

    • > I'm against anybody who can convince you to open a PDF being able to hack your device to do whatever they like with it.

      Who is saying this part?

      Asking for an open device does not mean supporting malicious hacking of others. This is the single biggest false equivalence used by Apple and the rest of the industry to keep a closed ecosystem and restrict users' control over stuff they paid for. And people continue perpetuating it for some reason.

      6 replies →