← Back to context

Comment by stymaar

1 hour ago

> Are you saying people unfamiliar with the 'pixel arts' can't enjoy it their own way?

The problem isn't that they look shitty to pixel artists or experts, they look shitty for anyone with a bit of observation.

It's junk art the same way Mc Donald's is junk food.

It's calorie-dense and high in sodium?

I think we could do a bit better here with the explanation of what looks bad to you..

  • I am just a layperson when it comes to pixel art, but to me the example in the article is clearly garbage/low quality.

    - the magenta background is still visible along the edges - the color palette is all over the place - random noise pixels of totally different colors are visible scattered around - the lighting and shading doesn't look that good