← Back to context

Comment by overfeed

6 hours ago

> You also arent calculating the salaries of the people involved, of which there's only a few thousand worldwide in your hiring pool.

There were probably a few dozen 20 years ago, and the existing pool grew from somewhere. AI (nee machine learning) is not rocket science - but it is a science, so it rewards those who are literate, curious, can hypothesize, experiment and learn from results to gain an intuition. I bet most statistics-adjacent professionals (millions, worldwide) can move laterally into AI research and excel at it. Nevermind AI has been among the most-in-demand undergrad programs since ChatGPT dropped. The only limited pool is for celebrity AI talent.

You should start a recruiting outfit then if its that easy, because you could be making 40-60k per hire!!!

Your average Stats/machine learning expertise has little to do with standing up training infra and pipelines across $50 million in gpus.