← Back to context Comment by dominotw 1 day ago I've never middle management cut to same levels as IC. I dont know why that is though. 4 comments dominotw Reply stackskipton 1 day ago I have but it's rarely done by buyouts or with same IC mass layoffs. There is also generally less managers.Most of time, it's after all IC, they look at what's left, decide what moves to make and lay off the managers.However, I have seen more and more where managers are told what's happening and they find new jobs before layoffs. gpvos 20 hours ago For non-Americans: IC = Independent contributor = employee without people reporting to them ihsw 1 day ago [dead] DANmode 1 day ago The same reason you’ve never seen the US Congress meaningfully change anything about their role, compensation, etc.
stackskipton 1 day ago I have but it's rarely done by buyouts or with same IC mass layoffs. There is also generally less managers.Most of time, it's after all IC, they look at what's left, decide what moves to make and lay off the managers.However, I have seen more and more where managers are told what's happening and they find new jobs before layoffs.
gpvos 20 hours ago For non-Americans: IC = Independent contributor = employee without people reporting to them
DANmode 1 day ago The same reason you’ve never seen the US Congress meaningfully change anything about their role, compensation, etc.
I have but it's rarely done by buyouts or with same IC mass layoffs. There is also generally less managers.
Most of time, it's after all IC, they look at what's left, decide what moves to make and lay off the managers.
However, I have seen more and more where managers are told what's happening and they find new jobs before layoffs.
For non-Americans: IC = Independent contributor = employee without people reporting to them
[dead]
The same reason you’ve never seen the US Congress meaningfully change anything about their role, compensation, etc.