← Back to context Comment by babelfish 1 day ago So you have decided the model is bad without having used it yet? 3 comments babelfish Reply cbg0 1 day ago If they had a model on par with Opus 5.5 there would be no need to undercut it by that much, that's probably the logic. rfgplk 1 day ago Anthropic models are comically overpriced. They also gobble up an obscene # of tokens to get the same result as others. The price delta is literally 5x. mwigdahl 1 day ago No, I have decided I don't trust benchmarks without using the model first.
cbg0 1 day ago If they had a model on par with Opus 5.5 there would be no need to undercut it by that much, that's probably the logic. rfgplk 1 day ago Anthropic models are comically overpriced. They also gobble up an obscene # of tokens to get the same result as others. The price delta is literally 5x.
rfgplk 1 day ago Anthropic models are comically overpriced. They also gobble up an obscene # of tokens to get the same result as others. The price delta is literally 5x.
If they had a model on par with Opus 5.5 there would be no need to undercut it by that much, that's probably the logic.
Anthropic models are comically overpriced. They also gobble up an obscene # of tokens to get the same result as others. The price delta is literally 5x.
No, I have decided I don't trust benchmarks without using the model first.