Comment by musicale

I don't understand why Pharo doesn't proudly acknowledge that it is a version of Smalltalk on its landing page, rather than this lukewarm statement on its About page:

> A dynamic, pure, reflective object-oriented programming language in the tradition of Smalltalk

Why not call it a modern Smalltalk, which seems to be what it is?

Smalltalk is a great language and its ecosystem deserves to grow.