← Back to context Comment by foo12bar 8 hours ago Stick your head in it and breathe. You'll know. 6 comments foo12bar Reply jibalt 8 hours ago Not only is that statement not true, as noted by others, it's also not at all relevant to what you're responding to. foo12bar 12 minutes ago What? Why isn't it true? You're saying you couldn't tell if a liquid entered your lungs? pmontra 5 hours ago Sand too, even when dry. But OK, metaphors have limits. aleph_minus_one 8 hours ago There exist lots of non-wetting liquids in which humans cannot breathe. stavros 3 hours ago By that definition, a vacuum is wet. pizzafeelsright 8 hours ago Fog, clouds, steam, ice.
jibalt 8 hours ago Not only is that statement not true, as noted by others, it's also not at all relevant to what you're responding to. foo12bar 12 minutes ago What? Why isn't it true? You're saying you couldn't tell if a liquid entered your lungs?
foo12bar 12 minutes ago What? Why isn't it true? You're saying you couldn't tell if a liquid entered your lungs?
Not only is that statement not true, as noted by others, it's also not at all relevant to what you're responding to.
What? Why isn't it true? You're saying you couldn't tell if a liquid entered your lungs?
Sand too, even when dry. But OK, metaphors have limits.
There exist lots of non-wetting liquids in which humans cannot breathe.
By that definition, a vacuum is wet.
Fog, clouds, steam, ice.