Comment by kvuj

> I think a better question to ask, whatever someone's background, is "do you want to know the truth, even if it turns out you don't believe it now, and are you willing to follow it no matter what the cost?"

I don't understand. Is it a rhetorical statement from your part?

How can you know that what you are being told is the truth? If it can be proven, then there is no need to be told or to doubt it. If it can't be proven (or at least observed), then by definition, it is a belief, not a truth.

Also why would you agree to learn the truth if you're not going to believe it?