← Back to context Comment by citizenpaul 5 hours ago 99% of the legislation changes are made by 20 something interns, on behalf of someone. 3 comments citizenpaul Reply Henchman21 5 hours ago Indeed, both the name of the intern and the attribution on behalf-of should be required in the signed commit. antihipocrat 3 hours ago ..and the name of the lobby group that prepared it for the intern. zoobab 3 hours ago That was the same for the software patent directive, we had leaks of amendments proposed by big companies, we could see that Members of Parliament were just copy pasting them.
Henchman21 5 hours ago Indeed, both the name of the intern and the attribution on behalf-of should be required in the signed commit. antihipocrat 3 hours ago ..and the name of the lobby group that prepared it for the intern. zoobab 3 hours ago That was the same for the software patent directive, we had leaks of amendments proposed by big companies, we could see that Members of Parliament were just copy pasting them.
antihipocrat 3 hours ago ..and the name of the lobby group that prepared it for the intern. zoobab 3 hours ago That was the same for the software patent directive, we had leaks of amendments proposed by big companies, we could see that Members of Parliament were just copy pasting them.
zoobab 3 hours ago That was the same for the software patent directive, we had leaks of amendments proposed by big companies, we could see that Members of Parliament were just copy pasting them.
Indeed, both the name of the intern and the attribution on behalf-of should be required in the signed commit.
..and the name of the lobby group that prepared it for the intern.
That was the same for the software patent directive, we had leaks of amendments proposed by big companies, we could see that Members of Parliament were just copy pasting them.