← Back to context Comment by estearum 2 hours ago Yeah the real answer is banning private funding from politics in as many ways as possible. 4 comments estearum Reply tomaskafka 1 hour ago As long as there are people who allocate billions with a sign of the pen, with zero personal responsibility and skin in the game, there will be whole industries dedicated to swaying their hand. estearum 1 hour ago Right, and there can be laws that make their efforts more or less effective.For example, we could behead people convicted of corrupting or being corrupted. That would be a significant deterrent. kown7 1 hour ago While I like the sentiment, the law of unintended consequences will most likely strike back hard. 1 reply →
tomaskafka 1 hour ago As long as there are people who allocate billions with a sign of the pen, with zero personal responsibility and skin in the game, there will be whole industries dedicated to swaying their hand. estearum 1 hour ago Right, and there can be laws that make their efforts more or less effective.For example, we could behead people convicted of corrupting or being corrupted. That would be a significant deterrent. kown7 1 hour ago While I like the sentiment, the law of unintended consequences will most likely strike back hard. 1 reply →
estearum 1 hour ago Right, and there can be laws that make their efforts more or less effective.For example, we could behead people convicted of corrupting or being corrupted. That would be a significant deterrent. kown7 1 hour ago While I like the sentiment, the law of unintended consequences will most likely strike back hard. 1 reply →
kown7 1 hour ago While I like the sentiment, the law of unintended consequences will most likely strike back hard. 1 reply →
As long as there are people who allocate billions with a sign of the pen, with zero personal responsibility and skin in the game, there will be whole industries dedicated to swaying their hand.
Right, and there can be laws that make their efforts more or less effective.
For example, we could behead people convicted of corrupting or being corrupted. That would be a significant deterrent.
While I like the sentiment, the law of unintended consequences will most likely strike back hard.
1 reply →