← Back to context Comment by 0ddj0b 6 hours ago Absurd mental gymnastics here - of course it matters (and on wholly-owned, non-public land as well). 2 comments 0ddj0b Reply newspaper1 5 hours ago You think Google should just get to do whatever they want? I don't. Get the permit. We should throw everyone responsible into prison. 0ddj0b 4 hours ago We retain different baseline assumptions.It makes no sense to need a permit to cut down logging forest (legally acquired private property) in the first place, so I'm wholly unbothered by Google's actions and don't believe they reflect a moral wrong.
newspaper1 5 hours ago You think Google should just get to do whatever they want? I don't. Get the permit. We should throw everyone responsible into prison. 0ddj0b 4 hours ago We retain different baseline assumptions.It makes no sense to need a permit to cut down logging forest (legally acquired private property) in the first place, so I'm wholly unbothered by Google's actions and don't believe they reflect a moral wrong.
0ddj0b 4 hours ago We retain different baseline assumptions.It makes no sense to need a permit to cut down logging forest (legally acquired private property) in the first place, so I'm wholly unbothered by Google's actions and don't believe they reflect a moral wrong.
You think Google should just get to do whatever they want? I don't. Get the permit. We should throw everyone responsible into prison.
We retain different baseline assumptions.
It makes no sense to need a permit to cut down logging forest (legally acquired private property) in the first place, so I'm wholly unbothered by Google's actions and don't believe they reflect a moral wrong.