Comment by ericmay
7 hours ago
> I don't care who profits, profit doesn't matter, I care about units moved.
That doesn't make much sense to me other than China's goal of trying to subsidize its companies and run other automakers out of business, but the US has already prevented China from entering the market (so 340 million of the richest customers on the planet are unavailable) and Europe will continue to restrict Chinese EV sales as well.
So that leaves China where exactly? Exporting $10,000 EVs to Indonesia? Sorry but that's not a big enough market with enough profit to keep the companies busy. Plus you have a glut of Chinese EV makers in China that are going to go out of business precisely because the economics don't work.
You can't sell cars at a loss indefinitely but if China wants to give away a lot of money to other countries without auto industries I mean they're welcome to do that. I just don't understand the economics of it. I'm not sure you're accounting for them either.
> Bookmark my comment for five years from now, see if I'm wrong. China has shown they can scale, the rest of the world has not.
I'm not sure what you're trying to be right or wrong about. Simultaneously you're citing things that I've cited (I guess you didn't read my comments for some reason) as reasons that Europe will restrict Chinese EV sales. The US already has. Japan and Korea will too, to varying extents.
Scaling doesn't matter if you don't have customers or you aren't making money.
> Chinese carmakers now sell one EV abroad for every two at home - https://restofworld.org/2026/china-ev-exports-overcapacity-g... - August 18th, 2026
This is the exact kind of problem that I'm highlighting. China's domestic market is faltering, there is a lot of subsidization and uneconomic business practices, and this leads to a race to the bottom which means many of these auto manufacturers will have to go bankrupt because they can't compete on cost. Instead China has to turn its over-capacity to its export markets. The problem is who will those markets be? Of course many Chinese automakers will survive all of this and go on to let's say be the dominant player in, idk, Indonesia and Brazil or something, but the export markets that everybody wants to play in are closing their doors precisely because the Chinese cars are too heavily subsidized or the cost is too low (regardless of reason) which would cause the domestic manufacturers to go out of business. Obviously the US, Europe, Japan, Korea aren't going to let that happen.
Selling 2 EVs abroad for every 1 at home is a bad sign, not a good one.
I am excited that China is pushing out combustion vehicles globally. Every unit they move assists in this, as well as reducing oil demand. I don't care what happens the US or Europe legacy auto, I don't care if the vehicles are profitable, as long as China will continue to scale and sell them, and cram down combustion vehicle sales. Subsidies, no subsidies, that's a silly argument. It's just lines on a spreadsheet. The Western world is sad China plays by different spreadsheet rules, it is what it is. China doesn't need profits, they need to keep their economy producing, even if at breakeven, or a potential loss.
https://ember-energy.org/data/ev-sales-tracker/ (upper right hand corner of data viz).
> As of September 2026, there were an estimated 90.6 million EVs on the road, including 61.5M battery electric and 29.1M plug-in hybrids. In a single day, these vehicles displace 1.44 million barrels of oil. [My note: Every month of EV sales improves this number, permanently]
China will continue to scale up EV sales, and combustion vehicles will continue to decline. That's my point. Peak combustion vehicles sales was 2017, it's all down hill from here. How long to 100% EV sales? Probably not 5 years, potentially 10-15 years. Depends on when we hit step change tipping points and petroleum supply chain death spirals.
The sooner legacy auto and combustion vehicle makers are pushed to economic failure, the faster EV deployments go faster. So, push them to failure. This matters to me because of climate change, but I understand this might not matter to others. "It is what it is."
https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/global-sales-of-com...
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/electric-car-sales?tab=li...
You are not thinking in systems. Think in systems.
> I am excited that China is pushing out combustion vehicles globally.
Well China isn't the only country that builds electric vehicles, but even so internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles will be around for a long time. Actually that's in part because of China. We'd have seen greater adoption by now but because in part of Chinese hoarding of rare earth mineral processing American, European, Japanese, and Korean automakers have had to maintain ICE fleets. Of course, as you noted, there are scaling issues, they don't want to spend the money to develop EVs when the markets aren't really settled, &c. but there are quite a few factors at play. If you care about emissions/oil/energy usage you should actually be in favor of no cars to hold a more consistent position.
> Every unit they move assists in this, as well as reducing oil demand.
The good thing is that China helps US/EU/J/K/&c. here because reducing oil demand in other countries means there is more available for us to keep using.
> I don't care what happens the US or Europe legacy auto
Sure but US and Europe do and because they do they say sorry China can't sell your cars here and then China can't sell its cars there. They lose out on lots of $$ but as you said that's fine so it works for everyone.
> Subsidies, no subsidies, that's a silly argument.
China doesn't have infinite money so it's not a silly argument.
> The Western world is sad China plays by different spreadsheet rules, it is what it is.
What do we have to be sad about? We just say sorry can't sell your cars here and then we just keep living our awesome lives.
> China doesn't need profits, they need to keep their economy producing, even if at breakeven, or a potential loss.
You need profits though, that's an inescapable fact of reality. Otherwise you just go out of business.
> China will continue to scale up EV sales, and combustion vehicles will continue to decline. That's my point. Peak combustion vehicles sales was 2017, it's all down hill from here.
Well vehicle sales will decline even in China across all vehicles, not just ICE or EV. Continuing to scale up EV sales when sales will decline and your TAM isn't as big as you think means you're spending a lot of money building factories that won't get used. Resources and money are limited (this isn't a debatable fact) so at some point you just can't do it anymore, the companies go bust, and then at least in the west we never really cared because we're doing our own thing with our own cars.