Comment by cyclopeanutopia
10 hours ago
Stopped at
> I won’t go into too much detail in this post, because I think in this era, you can just ask your agents to fill in the details :)
10 hours ago
Stopped at
> I won’t go into too much detail in this post, because I think in this era, you can just ask your agents to fill in the details :)
If you can understand nuance and context, you would realise the phrase right before that is saying that he's not going to go into details about how navigation itself works in Chrome/Edge, and to watch the presentation from Google itself about those specific details if you are so inclined.
If you then continued on to read the remainder of the article, you would also discover that there was no AI assistance in this research at all.
It’s actually super detailed. That sentence might as well not exist
It's your loss. The whole article is very good written.
And much better for not going into needless detail.
In fact, a problem with LLMs is that they consistently write more than I want to read.
The article does actually go pretty in detail about the exploit.
Same; either put in the work to think it through and show us your thought process and conclusions, or just post your prompts and call it a day and everyone gets to move on.
If you continued to read the article, you would discover that he indeed goes through his entire thought process in building this chain. Including the fact this was done with no AI assistance at all.
I stand corrected then, I’ll return to it!
it's sort of funny, because before you even get to the line you stopped at, and then assumed that they used ai, you have to read this part:
"Anyway, this is what I built for Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 — a completely handmade, logic-only Microsoft Edge Full Chain, with no memory corruption, and no AI at all!"
Imagine missing such a great bug-chain because an off-hand AI comment at the start put you off
No need to imagine it.